Integrity in Leadership Essay -- Ethical Integrity Essays

Definition of fair playSince this paper palms with the idea of rectitude in leadership, it is useful to start this paper defining lawfulness. Websters dictionary defines integrity as uncompromising adherence to a code of moral, artistic or opposite values utter sincerity, honesty and candor, avoidance of deception, expediency, or shallowness of whatsoever kind Let us exam this definition a bit deeper. The first part of the definition talks of uncompromising adherence. This marrow that one would unendingly choose the right path, regardless of what seems to be more than appealing. Take the example of when and when not to lie. A person of integrity would always tell the truth regardless of the situation. The second part of the definition deals with what to avoid. integrity demands complete forthrightness always. The leader of integrity would never soften to wittingly deceive his constituents at any time. The leader would always be open and honest.Theories of truthThere ar m any different theories of integrity, but this drafting will barely discuss devil. The first, Integrity of Self Interests, will deal with integrity as it pertains to a leaders outperform course of action for himself. The second, Integrity of Utility, will deal with integrity as it pertains to the best course for the population.Integrity of Self InterestsIs it better to lie or tell the truth. Trying to psychoanalyze this question using the theory of self-interests would depend upon which choice would give the best results for the leader. This is the under manufacturing theme for the theory of self interests. There ar two basic formulas that can be used when trying to determine what is moral, and they are1.We should choose the action(s) that we feel, with good reason, will benefit us more than any other choice 2.We should choose the action(s) that are in our best interests, or that we prefer for the best perceived outcomeThese two formulas can be implemented when making any decis ion. If you feel something will benefit you, or that you prefer one choice over another, then that choice is a choice of integrity of self interest. To illustrate this better, let us go back to the earlier example of when to lie. By applying either of these two formulas, lying can be considered moral. If lying were either in our best interests or one perceives it to result in the best outcome, than it is ... ...es not have to be a good leader.ConclusionThere are many theories on integrity, but this draft focused on using two, the theories of self-interest and utility. These are the two theories a leader can use when trying to induce an ethical decision. The constituents prefer the theory of utility because it ensures the best result for the virtually people. However the leader may sometimes prefer the theory of self-interests. The only relevance integrity has to leadership, is in choice. If a leader is not felt up to have integrity, he is less likely to be chosen as a leader. Ho wever once in power, integrity does not real make a difference. Effectiveness does not depend on integrity. As stated earlier, Bill Clinton has been considered one of the most effective Presidents in the memorial of the United States, but he is not considered moral, especially after the Lewinski indignation came to light. Using the different criteria under the theories of first self-interest, then utility, one could try to answer the question of Clinton?s best course of action. In other words, using the outlined decision making processes, was it the best decision to countenance the affair with Monica Lewinski to the public?